Effectiveness of a nursing intervention in the better quality of patient’s bowel preparation with ambulatory colonoscopy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60108/ce.40Keywords:
colonoscopy; nursing; bowel preparation; educationAbstract
Although adequate bowel preparation is an essential requirement for a quality and safe colonoscopy, many of the patients come with a poor preparation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a previous health education carried out by nurses.
Method. Quasi-experimental study, double blind, formed by two groups of patients: one of intervention, in which they have been previously called informing of the diet to follow and reaffirm hour to take evacuation product, and another control, which will follow the usual practice in the preparation of colonoscopies.
Results. 205 patients were analyzed, 102 in the intervention group. The sociodemographic and clinical data variables were comparable (homogeneous) between groups. The poor preparation rate was significantly reduced (p = 0.003). The adherence to preparation instructions was significantly higher in the educated group (p = 0.000), 73% of the intervention group patients performed with the instructions against 27%.
Conclusions. An educational nurse intervention prior to the realization of the colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation of patients, improving the adherence to the instructions for preparation and reduction of the number of suspended procedures.
References
López Rosés L., Olivencia Palomar P. Colonoscopia. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas. 2008; 100 (6)
Jover R, Herráiz M, Alarcón O, Brullet E, Bujanda L, BustamanteM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines: Quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screenBVGing. Spanish Society of Gastroentero-logy (AEG) and Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(SEED) working group. Endoscopy. 2012;44:444-51.3
Johnson D, Barkun A, Cohen L, Dominitz J, Kaltenbach T, Martel M et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the U.S. Multi- Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2014;80(4):543- 562
Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF, et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:781---94.
Cohen L. Advances in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal
Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 2015;25(2):183-197.
Sweetser S, Baron T. Optimizing bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. Mayo Clinic
Proceeding. 2015;90(4):520-526
Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2001;96: 1797–1802
Yee R, Manoharan S, Hall C, Hayashi A. Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: what are the predictors of an inadequate preparation? Am J Surg. 2015 May;209(5):787-92; discussion 792. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.018. PubMed PMID: 25796095.
Lee YJ, Kim ES, Park KS, Cho KB, Jang BK, Chung W et al. Education for Ward Nurses Influences the Quality of Inpatient’s Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. Medicine. 2015:94(34): e1423.
Lee Y, Kim E, Choi J, Lee K, Park K, Cho et al. Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the qualiy of bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study. Endoscopy. 2015;47(11):1018-1027.
Kurlander J, Sondhi A, Waljee A, Menees S, Connell C, Schoenfeld P et al. How Efficacious Are Patient Education Interventions to Improve Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy? A Systematic Review. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164442.
Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. TheBoston bowel preparation scale: A valid and reliable instru-ment for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc.2009;69:620---5.
Calderwood A, Jacobson B. Comprehensive validation of the Boston bowel preparation scale. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2010;72(4):686-692
Ruiz Romero D, Téllez Ávila F. Preparación para colonoscopia en 2016: recomendaciones actuales usando datos nacionales. Endoscopia. 2016;28(2):81-89.
Nguyen D, Jamal M, Nguyen E, Puli S, Bechtold M. Low-residue versus clear liquid diet before colonoscopy: a metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2016;83(3):499-507.
Song G, Tian X, Ma L, Yi L, Shuai T, Zeng Z et a. Regime for Bowel Preparation in Patients Scheduled to Colonoscopy. Medicine. 2016;95(1):e2432
Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM, Schowengerdt SW, Yust JB, Choudhary A et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethy-lene glycol before colonoscopy: A meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1240---5.
Enestvedt B, Tofani C, Laine L, Tierney A, Fennerty M. 4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1225-1231.
Mathus-Vliegen E, van der Vliet K. Safety, patient’s tolerance, and efficacy of a 2- liter vitamin C-enriched macrogol bowel preparation. Diseases of the ColonRectum. 2013;56:1002-1012.
Belsey J, Crosta C, Epstein O, Fischbach W, Layer P, ParenteF, et al. Meta-analysis: The relative efficacy of oral bowel pre-parations for colonoscopy 1985-2010. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.2012;35:222---37
Weir MA, Fleet JL, Vinden C, Shariff SZ, Liu K, Song H, et al. Hyponatremia and sodium picosulfate bowel preparations inolder adults. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:686---94
Téllez-Ávila F, Murcio-Pérez E, Saúl A, Herrera-Gómez S, Valdovinos-Andraca F. Acosta- Nava V et al. Efficacy and tolerability of low-volume (2 L) versus single-(4 L) versus split.dose (2 L + 2 L) polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Randomized clinical trial. Digestive Endoscopy. 2014;26(6):731-736.
Smith S, von Wagner C, McGregor L,Curtis L, Wilson E, Serper M et al. The Influence of Health Literacy on Comprehension of a Colonoscopy Preparation Information Leaflet. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2012; 55(10): 1074-1080
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
En caso de que el artículo sea publicado, los autores aceptan transferir todos los derechos del trabajo presentado, incluidos los derechos de autor y aquellos relativos a la transmisión electrónica, exclusivamente a CODEM, de manera universal, en todos los idiomas, una vez que el trabajo haya sido aceptado para su publicación dentro de la revista electrónica CONOCIMIENTO ENFERMERO.
El autor podrá hacer copias ilimitadas del trabajo para uso docente, reutilizarlo en su totalidad o parcialmente en un libro escrito por el autor o hacer copias para su distribución en la institución en la que trabaja. CODEM hará mención al nombre del autor en las publicaciones que se realicen del trabajo.
